Anyone can publish an opinion. SRC publishes the reasoning behind it — every assessment carries a CQR scorecard so you can judge the judgement.
Every assessment lists what it drew on — primary where possible, dated, and weighted. You can retrace the evidence.
The load-bearing claims are separated from framing, each tagged with the confidence we actually hold in it.
We state the strongest version of the opposing read — not a strawman — so you see where the judgement could break.
A calibrated confidence level, not false certainty. Where the picture is thin, we say so.
SRC takes no position for hire. Our analysts are named, our corrections are public, and our funding comes from members — not from anyone with a stake in the conclusion. Swiss neutrality isn’t a slogan here; it’s the operating discipline.
When we’re wrong, we say so — visibly, with the same scorecard that made the original claim auditable. That is the standard we ask you to hold us to.